Welcome to the blog of Commissioner Clive Adams. Leader of The Salvation Army United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland

At what cost, bargains?

7 November 2013 - 5:20pm
| by Clive Adams

Yesterday, my beloved wife completed yet another shopping expedition – a holiday near Christmas, combined with inclement weather is a permutation that has inevitable repercussions! I find it exasperating that she always manages to find amazing bargains. I had assumed she would be using that iPad to do research on deep theological matters, such as considering the three epistemological questions in relation to our knowledge of God, but her search engine has other words recorded in its history – and words having the base-word ‘shop’ feature prominently.

Despite what it sounds like, it should be noted that my wife is no shopaholic! She shops for ‘essentials’ – although while I accept that we need clothes and food, I am yet to be convinced that ‘Christmassy things’ are essential – and more often than not returns with nothing, because she didn’t find anything worth buying or worth the money being asked for it. She is careful – painfully careful – about spending money, and so prefers to go without something than expend too much money on it. And, perhaps, there lies the rub for today’s thoughts. So, read on, Macduff! (To unashamedly misquote unashamedly the misquoted Shakespearean quotation!)

She had spent a pittance on an outfit for a party she will be attending in the near future. Like her mother, she prides herself on finding ridiculously inexpensive outfits that look smashing – in contrast to my mom who liked costlier attire for special occasions! She’d also found a pair of jeans for me that were a giveaway. I was chuffed, of course!

This morning, with that pair of jeans casually draped over a chair, I read a CNN news report which challenged me –yet again – about complacent shopping habits. The story started with a letter – a copy of the opening paragraphs was published…

The letter was written by an inmate in a labour camp in China who was making Hallowe’en decorations for the American market and who sneaked the letter inside one of the decorations, hoping to announce to the world the plight of the inmates of that camp. The full story can be accessed here.

We frequently hear reports of labour camps, sweatshops and the like and, whereas there is outrage for a while, my own tendency to forget and move on is, I suppose, typical of the vast majority of us in the West. As long as these issues do not directly affect us, we can shelve them in fairly good conscience. And, frankly, there are so many causes, so much injustice and exploitation going on, that we can’t absorb it all. From the Bangladeshi garment-workers who gained news prominence recently, to today’s report from India of a maid being beaten to death, to exploitative practices in the food industry in Britain, there is a seemingly endless list of people being abused – not only for sexual exploitation but often for various forms of exploitative labour. Statistics from World Vision are extremely alarming:

  • Globally, 12.3 million people are trapped in forced labour
  • 217.7 million children (between 5 and 17 years of age) are working in child labour
  • Of these, 126 million are trapped in “the worst forms of child labour”, which include trafficking, armed conflict, debt bondage, sexual exploitation and hazardous work.
  • In 2006, 18 per cent of state-identified trafficked victims in 52 countries were exploited for their labour.

(Read the full World Vision report here.)

It soon becomes too much to handle and so we switch off. However, I am not so sure that we can afford (pun intended!) to keep suppressing this inhumane – indeed, inhuman – state of affairs. Quite rightly, we should continue to demand that industry and the market be stringent in their partnerships and that government to be stronger in dealing with countries where such appalling practices persist under apparent official sanction. It seems that the greater the economic power of a nation – such as China – the more muted become protests about human rights abuses and the less likely bans and embargoes are issued. It seems strange to me that the same countries that quite rightly banned South Africa for human rights abuses allow similar practice to go unaddressed – at least in the public domain – in other countries!

I think for us, as individual consumers, it behoves us to be as diligent as we can. I was pleased to discover that – in fact – my wife has checked on the policies of the outlet from which she acquired yesterday’s bargains. She has also stopped buying at two other outlets because there are questions about their partnerships. She remains adamant that, should it be shown that bargains are bartered for people’s freedom and basic rights as opposed to the big corporate’s profit margins, she’d rather pay more or not at all.

That’s fair, but more, from a Christian perspective, it’s just!


Submitted by Moira de Swardt on

I love the fact that Christians have an opportunity to practice ethical thinking, and ethical behaviour, every day as we go about our daily lives in market places and at our places of employment.

We are truly the salt of the earth.

Thank you for reminding us of this.

Submitted by Stephen Poxon on

Commissioner, I believe you to be a good and caring man with a heart for suffering humanity. Your blog is clear evidence of this. Thank you for it.
May I, therefore, gently and respectfully pose the question, in the light of your blog; why is there still a range of Nestle products available for sale at THQ?
(I refer to Nestle chocolate and Nescafe.)
May I draw your attention to the documented fact that Nestle, as a company (I do not mean individuals who are employed by Nestle) have an appalling track record of abuse towards the poor, and a shameful involvement in using children as virtual slaves in the production of their goods.
Would you, as Territorial Commander, agree with me that it seems at odds with our entire ethos as a Movement ('to serve suffering humanity') for The Salvation Army still to be playing any part at all in swelling the coffers of a company who clearly put profit before humanity?
I have raised this question with senior Army leadership before, yet still Nescafe appears for sale at THQ.
Might I ask you, please, to award this issue your intelligent consideration? I would appreciate that a great deal - on behalf of the poor and those who are exploited.
Many thanks, as always.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Let us know your thoughts about this news story. This is an open, family-friendly community to encourage everyone to get involved, so please keep your comments clean and follow our Guidelines so we can publish your comment.

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.